About

Social Media & Marketing Director
High School Basketball Coach
University of Cincinnati Graduate
Center of Fiduciary Studies Graduate


My status

Three Equity Factors

Three Equity Factors

Size and Value Premiums

Size and Value Premiums

Two Fixed Income Factors

Two Fixed Income Factors

Building on one of my recent video posts regarding market premiums and where they come from, this post shows what the premiums are, where those premiums come from and how they are managed.

Three Equity Factors

In the first image, you have three equity factors: sensitivity to the market, sensitivity to size and sensitivity to BTM (value stocks).  This image explains that there are known historical premiums for being in the market vs. fixed income, owning small companies vs. large companies and owning distressed (value) companies vs. growth companies.

Size and Value Premium

In the second image, you can see that these premiums exist in the US and internationally and are very generous over long historical time periods.  One thing to keep in mind here is that with additional premium comes additional risk, therefore diversification is key so as to minimize the risk associated with these asset categories.

*In US dollars. Developed markets value and growth index data provided by Fama/French (ex utilities). The S&P data are provided by Standard & Poor’s Index Services Group. US Small Cap Index is the CRSP 6-10 Index. CRSP data provided by the Center for Research in Security Prices, University of Chicago. International Small Cap index data: 1970-June 1981, 50% UK small cap stocks provided by the London Business School and 50% Japan small cap stocks provided by Nomura Securities; July 1981-present: simulated by Dimensional from StyleResearch securities data; includes securities of MSCI EAFE Index countries, market-capitalization weighted, each country capped at 50%. MSCI data copyright MSCI 2008, all rights reserved.
Indexes are not available for direct investment; therefore, their performance does not reflect the expenses associated with the management of an actual portfolio. Compound returns have an assumed rate of return, are hypothetical, and are not representative of any specific type of investment. Standard deviation is one method of measuring risk and performance, and is presented as an approximation.

Two Fixed Income Factors

In the third image, you can see two ways to manage fixed income in a portfolio.  Fixed income should be utilized in a portfolio to reduce or dampen equity risk.  Keeping maturities short and high quality is how you achieve this in a diversified portfolio.  What most people don’t realize when it comes to their investments is that as maturities lengthen in fixed income, it actually becomes as risky as stocks they hold.  Therefore, you should take the risk in equities since their expected returns are greater than fixed income.

An overall portfolio strategy utilizing these tools would beneficial to any investor, but utilizing an investor coach to implement and stay disciplined is the key to a successful investing experience.

Video posted at 3:24 PM (3 weeks ago) | Permalink

02/12/2010

Check out Mark Matson on “The Call” with Larry Kudlow.  Great segment with superb points about markets and investing.

Video posted at 2:57 PM (3 weeks ago) | Permalink

One word - Premium.  That is what the Three Factor Model is about.  If you are going to invest in the market, invest in asset categories or sections of the market that add premium to a portfolio.  Market/Size/Value.  Watch the video for an explanation.

Video posted at 2:11 PM (1 month ago) | Permalink

» The $3 Trillion 401(k) Rip-Off

Click the title to read an article by Dan Solin discussing the mismanagement of 401k assets by investment providers and plan sponsors.  Many plan sponsors have no idea that they are personally liable for the investment decisions they make on behalf of their participants.  It’s very easy: diversify globally, stay prudent and rebalance yet the lack of providers out there offering this type of vehicle makes it very hard to accomplish.

Link posted at 5:17 PM (1 month ago) | Permalink

How is it possible that someone like Jim Cramer can get things so wrong and still have people listen to their advice?  Quote from Navigating the Fog of Investing movie from an old proverb: He who predicts the future lies, even if he is telling the truth.

How is it possible that someone like Jim Cramer can get things so wrong and still have people listen to their advice?  Quote from Navigating the Fog of Investing movie from an old proverb: He who predicts the future lies, even if he is telling the truth.

Posted at 11:42 AM (1 month ago) | Permalink

» Seven Shocking Tips to Boost Your Returns by 400% (or More) - DailyFinance

Every investor needs a coach in order to be prudent and stay disciplined while investing in the market. This article by Dan Solin adds great support. Definitely worth a read.

Link posted at 12:18 PM (1 month ago) | Permalink

Here is a great clip of Alan Greenspan discussing the unpredictability of markets and the economy.

Video posted at 1:53 PM (5 months ago) | Permalink

This graphic is very interesting and telling.  Let’s put this in perspective.  There are currently roughly 8,400 stocks in the US market.  If you exclude the Top 10% of performers each year (840 stocks this year), your return suffers 3.4% annually.  

What this means is that if you go back to 1926 and invest $10,000 in all US stocks and compound annually with no additional investment, you end up with $17.3 million.  If you try to pick the best performing stocks (of which there is no data supporting anyone’s ability to do so) and you miss the Top 10% of performers each year, your $10,000 investment only grows to $1.2 million.  You miss out on $16 million!  If you miss the Top 25% of performers each year, your return drops to -1% per year.  I don’t think the math is needed for that one.  Stock picking is a risky proposition.  I wouldn’t try it.

This graphic is very interesting and telling. Let’s put this in perspective. There are currently roughly 8,400 stocks in the US market. If you exclude the Top 10% of performers each year (840 stocks this year), your return suffers 3.4% annually.

What this means is that if you go back to 1926 and invest $10,000 in all US stocks and compound annually with no additional investment, you end up with $17.3 million. If you try to pick the best performing stocks (of which there is no data supporting anyone’s ability to do so) and you miss the Top 10% of performers each year, your $10,000 investment only grows to $1.2 million. You miss out on $16 million! If you miss the Top 25% of performers each year, your return drops to -1% per year. I don’t think the math is needed for that one. Stock picking is a risky proposition. I wouldn’t try it.

Posted at 10:18 AM (6 months ago) | Permalink

08/07/2009

This is the classic example of, “If it’s too good to be true, it probably isn’t true.”  As you can see from the graphic, financial fraud is increasingly being committed over the past couple of years in the US.  As investment products become more and more exotic and overpromising, so to comes exposure to fraud.  There are no magic beans when it comes to investing, etc.  Own the market, stay disciplined and rebalance.  It’s as simple as that.  

Be careful out there.

This is the classic example of, “If it’s too good to be true, it probably isn’t true.” As you can see from the graphic, financial fraud is increasingly being committed over the past couple of years in the US. As investment products become more and more exotic and overpromising, so to comes exposure to fraud. There are no magic beans when it comes to investing, etc. Own the market, stay disciplined and rebalance. It’s as simple as that.

Be careful out there.

Posted at 10:12 AM (7 months ago) | Permalink

This must be some sort of parallel universe where one self proclaimed financial guru (destroyer of wealth) is touting the financial abilities of a former baseball player turned self proclaimed financial guru (idiot). Oh no, wait a minute, it’s just a clip of Jim Cramer touting Lenny Dykstra. Now I get it. Role tape.

Video posted at 11:13 AM (7 months ago) | Permalink